Melampaui Slogan: Seperempat Abad Bukti, Dampak, dan Jejaring Global Pengarusutamaan Gender di Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55480/saluscultura.v5i2.498Keywords:
Pengarusutamaan Gender, Kolaborasi Global, SDGs, Inklusi Digital, Evolusi Tematik, Interseksionalitas, Tata Kelola PendidikanAbstract
Penelitian ini memetakan secara komprehensif evolusi intelektual, struktur jaringan, dan arah masa depan riset pengarusutamaan gender dalam pendidikan selama seperempat abad terakhir (2000-2025). Dengan menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik dan analisis jaringan terhadap 7.919 dokumen terindeks Scopus, studi ini mengidentifikasi tren produktivitas ilmiah, aktor kunci, pola kolaborasi, klaster tematik, serta pilar teoretis yang membentuk bidang ini. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Biblioshiny (R/Bibliometrix) dan VOSviewer untuk memvisualisasikan hubungan co-authorship, co-occurrence, dan co-citation. Hasil menunjukkan pertumbuhan publikasi eksponensial dengan laju rata-rata 16,2% per tahun, yang mengalami akselerasi signifikan setelah adopsi Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDGs) pada tahun 2015 dan selama transformasi digital pendidikan akibat pandemi COVID-19. Jaringan kolaborasi memperlihatkan dominasi negara-negara Global North (Amerika Serikat, Inggris), disertai kemunculan poros Hispanik yang menghubungkan Spanyol dan Amerika Latin. Secara tematik, riset bergeser dari isu kesetaraan akses menuju persoalan interseksionalitas, kesenjangan digital, dan partisipasi perempuan dalam STEM. Analisis co-citationmengidentifikasi lima pilar intelektual utama yang berakar pada teori sosial-ekonomi, psikologi, organisasi, feminisme kritis, dan metodologi ilmiah. Secara konseptual, penelitian ini merumuskan Kerangka Tata Kelola Pendidikan Pengarusutamaan Gender (Gender Mainstreaming Education Governance/GMEG Framework), yang menempatkan kebijakan, pedagogi, dan inklusi digital sebagai pilar utama dalam tata kelola pendidikan berkeadilan gender. Temuan ini menawarkan peta pengetahuan global yang dapat menjadi dasar bagi pembuat kebijakan, praktisi, dan akademisi dalam merumuskan intervensi berbasis bukti dan mengarahkan agenda riset masa depan untuk memperkuat kesetaraan gender dalam pembangunan pendidikan berkelanjutan.
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912439000400200
Ahmad, R., Sharif, F., Ahmad, S., Gul, A., & Abdirasulovna, Z. A. (2024). Does the digital economy improve female employment? A cross-country panel data analysis. Heliyon, 10(13), e33535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33535
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Dobrokhotov, D. A., Sayapina, A. E., Khairullina, E. R., Khafizova, A. A., Prokopyev, A. I., & Erokhova, N. S. (2025). Exploring gender in ICT integrated STEM education: A bibliometric study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep589. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16741
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
EQUALS Global Partnership. (2021). The gender digital divide: An overview of key trends. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Women in STEM in higher education: Good practices of attraction, access, retention, and development. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92491-7
Gavinolla, M. R., Livina, A., & Swain, S. K. (2022). State of the Research on Teacher Education and Sustainability: A Bibliometrics Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0022
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Kabeer, N. (2012). Empowerment, citizenship and gender justice: A contribution to locally grounded theories of change in women’s lives. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2012.704055
Kataeva, Z., Durrani, N., Izekenova, Z., & Roshka, V. (2025). Investigating Trends and Developments in Academic Research and Publications on Gender and STEM: A Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 15(2), 21582440251338191. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251338191
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak (KemenPPPA). (2023). Peta Jalan Pengarusutamaan Gender 2023–2025. Jakarta: KemenPPPA.
Li, M., Hu, X., & Jin, K. (2025). The return on education and the gender wage gap in China: A sector perspective. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251327015
Lombardo, E., & Mergaert, L. (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training: A framework for studying implementation. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.851115
Miralles-Cardona, C. (2025). Teaching gender equality in teacher education: Does existing practice actually support gender mainstreaming implementation? Frontiers in Education, 10, 1570115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1570115
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Morley, L., & Crossouard, B. (2016). Gender in the neoliberalised global academy: The affective economy of women and leadership in South Asia. Higher Education, 71(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9929-4
Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2021). Digital literacy and gender equity in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 163, 104116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104116
OECD. (2023). Algorithmic bias in digital education systems: Policy perspectives. Paris: OECD Publishing.
O’Connor, P. (2023). Gendered leadership in higher education: Persistent inequalities. Gender and Education, 35(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2191462
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Ràfols, I. (2020). Science mapping and global inequality. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0806-5
Rao, A., & Kelleher, D. (2005). Is there life after gender mainstreaming? Gender & Development, 13(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332287
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Song, Z. (2024). Literature review of women’s leadership: A cross-cultural comparative study of gender equality. Advances in Applied Sociology, 14(8), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2024.148029
Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Women’s empowerment and education: Linking knowledge to transformative action. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12137
Stromquist, N. P. (2022). Feminist insights into global education governance: Persistent inequalities and the digital turn. International Journal of Educational Development, 93, 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102676
True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00179
UNDP. (2021). Gender Equality Strategy 2022–2025: Transforming systems to achieve gender equality. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNESCO. (2019). Global Education Monitoring Report 2019: Gender report – Building bridges for gender equality. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2022). Gender and digital learning: A policy framework for inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Unterhalter, E. (2017). Education and gender equality reconsidered. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report Discussion Paper.
Unterhalter, E., North, A., Arnot, M., Lloyd, C., Moletsane, R., Murphy-Graham, E., Parkes, J., & Saito, M. (2014). Interventions to enhance girls’ education and gender equality: A rigorous review of evidence. London: Department for International Development (DFID).
Unterhalter, E. (2021). Addressing Intersecting Inequalities in Education. In T. McCowan, & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Education and International Development: An Introduction (pp. 149-168). Bloomsbury Academic.
van Dijk, J., & van Deursen, A. (2020). Digital skills and the digital divide: Implications for gender equality in the knowledge society. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713848
Valero-Ancco, V. N., Gutierrez, F. S., Lujano-Ortega, Y., & Calderón-Quino, K. M. (2025). Global Trends in Gender Inequality in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (1993–2024). Educational Process International Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.19
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi018
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Bonino da Silva Santos, L., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., ... Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fiki Ikrom Ibrahim, Zulfa Ruhama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript Template
