Revisiting the State’s Targeting Design and Distribution of Social Protection Programs

Authors

  • Katiman Kartowinomo Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Cultural Affairs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55480/saluscultura.v1i1.4

Keywords:

social assistance, village deliberation, centralised targeting, mistargeting

Abstract

The Government of Indonesia has implemented social protection programs (SPPs) to reduce the impact of the economic crisis and continued to implement the programs in the recent pandemic situation. To increase the effectiveness of the program implementation, the state involves local governments and communities both in the targeting process and program delivery. The central government involves a village meeting called musyawarah desa (musdes) to update beneficiary’ data of social protection programs and Basis Data Terpadu (BDT-Unified Database). However, issues of mistargeting in the form of inclusion and exclusion error persist. Using the deliberative democracy framework and ethnographic case study approach, this study seeks to understand why mistargeting continues to occur by assessing the process of the musdes. This study found the problems of a centralized design of targeting in the existing social, power and accountability relations in the village, and suggest the need to consider giving more authority and responsibility to local governments and villages in the targeting process and delivery of the SPPs.

References

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Purnamasari, R., & Wai-Poi, M. (2019). Does Elite Capture Matter? Local Elites and Targeted Welfare Programs in Indonesia. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 334–339. Crossref | Google Scholar

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. (2012). Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1206–1240. Crossref | Google Scholar

Alderman, H. (2002). Do local officials know something we don’t? Decentralization of targeted transfers in Albania. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 375–404. Crossref | Google Scholar

Bah, A. B., Bazzi, S., Sumarto, S., & Tobias, J. (2018). Finding the Poor Vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia (Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS8342). World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/731751519134047409/Finding-the-poor-vs-measuring-their-poverty-exploring-the-drivers-of-targeting-effectiveness-in- Indonesia

Bain, K., Braun, F., & Saavedra, J. (2005). Voice and Accountability in Transfer Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. En Breve, 83. Google Scholar

Birner, R., & Wittmer, H. (2003). Using Social Capital to Create Political Capital: How Do Local Communities Gain Political Influence? A Theoretical Approach and Empirical Evidence from Thailand. In N. Dolšak & E. Ostrom (Eds.), The Commons in the New Millennium: Challenges and Adaptation (pp. 291–334). MIT Press. Google Scholar

Bohman, J. (1998). Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425. Crossref | Google Scholar

Conning, J., & Kevane, M. (2002). Community-Based Targeting Mechanisms for Social Safety Nets: A Critical Review. World Development, 30(3), 375–394. Crossref | Google Scholar

Dasgupta, A., & Beard, V. A. (2007). Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia. Development and Change, 38(2), 229–249. Crossref | Google Scholar

Faguet, J.-P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 867–893. Crossref | Google Scholar

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso. Google Scholar

Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Jacobs, A., & Wilford, R. (2010). Listen First: A pilot system for managing downward accountability in NGOs. Development in Practice, 20(7), 797–811. Crossref | Google Scholar

La Ferrara, E. (2002). Inequality and group participation: Theory and evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 235–273. Crossref | Google Scholar

Leisering, L. (2018). The Global Rise of Social Cash Transfers: How States and International Organizations Constructed a New Instrument for Combating Poverty (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. Crossref | Google Scholar

Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. Crossref | Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. F. (2020). The paradox of progressing sideways: Food poverty and livelihood change in the rice lands of outer island Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(5), 1077–1097. Crossref | Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. F., Steenbergen, D., Acciaioli, G., Baker, G., Lucas, A., Rambe, V., & Warren, C. (2014). 10. Dilemmas of participation: The National Community Empowerment Program. In H. Hill (Ed.), Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia (pp. 233–259). ISEAS Publishing. Crossref | Google Scholar

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar

Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1997). Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania (Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS1796). World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/183641468776985848/cents-and-sociability-household-income-and-social-capital-in-rural-tanzania

Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (4th ed.). Sage Publishing. Google Scholar

Subbarao, K., Bonnerjee, A., World Bank Group, Braithwaite, J., Carvalko, S., Ezemenari, K., World Bank, Graham, C., Thompson, A., & World Bank Staff. (1997). Safety Net Programs and Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Cross-country Experience. World Bank. Google Scholar

Sumadi, P. (2021). Peningkatan Akurasi Sasaran Program Perlindungan Sosial Melalui Pemutakhiran DTKS (Increasing Accuracy of Targeting of the Social Protection Programs Through DTKS Updating). Focus Group Discussion Pemutakhiran DTKS sebagai Dasar Penyaluran Program Bantuan Sosial yang Tepat Sasaran, Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia.

Sumarto, M. (2021). Welfare and Conflict: Policy Failure in the Indonesian Cash Transfer. Journal of Social Policy, 50(3), 533–551. Crossref | Google Scholar

Sumarto, M., & Ferdiansyah, F. (2021). Indonesia’s Social Policy Response to Covid-19: Targeted Social Protection under Budget Constraints. Global Dynamics of Social Policy. Crossref | Google Scholar

Tanasoca, A., & Sass, J. (2019). Ritual Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 27(2), 139–165. Crossref | Google Scholar

TNP2K. (2017). Basis Data Terpadu 2015: Untuk Memilah Penerima Manfaat Program Penanganan Fakir Miskin Berdasarkan Parameter yang Diinginkan. Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Google Scholar

Yamauchi, C. (2010). Community-Based Targeting and Initial Local Conditions: Evidence from Indonesia’s IDT Program. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(1), 95–147. Crossref | Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Kartowinomo, K. (2021). Revisiting the State’s Targeting Design and Distribution of Social Protection Programs. Salus Cultura: Jurnal Pembangunan Manusia Dan Kebudayaan, 1(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.55480/saluscultura.v1i1.4

Issue

Section

Articles